Skip to content

Exactech, Inc.: recalls, TPG ownership and bankruptcy

Whistle-blower suits and the 2025 False Claims Act settlement

In 2018 a former Exactech employee and two former sales representatives sued under the False Claims Act in Alabama, alleging the sale of defective knee implants, and a second relator later sued Exactech and TPG Capital in Maryland. Exactech contested the Alabama case; in September 2025 it agreed to pay $8 million to settle both cases without a determination of liability, having refused a ten-year Corporate Integrity Agreement. The Maryland claims against TPG Capital were dismissed without prejudice in 2026.

published
16 oct 2026
records as of
16 oct 2026
entities
167
sources
121
cite entities.csv

the questionWhat were the False Claims Act cases against Exactech, and how were they resolved?

1The Alabama case

analysisOn 29 June 2018 Brooks Wallace, Roberta Farley and Manuel Fuentes filed a qui tam suit in the Northern District of Alabama on behalf of the United States and several states, alleging that Exactech sold misbranded and defective knee implants. The government declined to intervene, and the complaint was unsealed in August 2019. The Settlement Trust's complaint says the suit concerned the finned tibial tray, that TPG learned of it in 2019 and that it was ready for trial when Exactech filed for bankruptcy. 1 2 3

qualification
The relators' allegations were resolved by settlement without a finding of liability; the Justice Department's release spells the second relator 'Robert Farley'. These are allegations in the Settlement Trust's complaint, which was pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery in October 2026; no court has ruled on them.
response
Exactech contested the suit. It moved to dismiss the complaint in December 2019, attaching an expert report and its earlier corporate integrity and deferred prosecution agreements; on 14 February 2020 the court struck the complaint as an impermissible shotgun pleading and denied that motion as moot. On 5 August 2020 the court granted in part and denied in part Exactech's motion to dismiss the amended complaint, dismissing the state-law claims without prejudice and leaving the federal claims pending, and Exactech answered the amended complaint on 19 August 2020.
outcome
Resolved by the $8 million False Claims Act settlement announced on 16 September 2025.

sources in this section

  1. Court record source · s-d7 identified by category only · Court record
  2. Court record source · s-d220 identified by category only · Court record
  3. Court record source · s-d24 identified by category only · Court record

2The Maryland case

analysisA second qui tam suit by Dr. Pasquale Petrera in the District of Maryland named both Exactech and TPG Capital, L.P.; in March 2026 the United States declined to intervene in the remaining claims against TPG Capital. 1 2

outcome
The claims against Exactech were resolved by the September 2025 settlement; those against TPG Capital, L.P. were dismissed without prejudice on 23 April 2026.

sources in this section

  1. Court record source · s-d143 identified by category only · Court record
  2. Court record source · s-d142 identified by category only · Court record

3The settlement

analysisOn 16 September 2025 the Justice Department announced that Exactech would pay $8 million, an amount based on its financial condition, to resolve allegations that it sold the finned tibial tray from 2008 to 2018 and the Logic and Truliant knees from 2019 to 2022 while knowing of their problems, causing false claims to Medicare, Medicaid and the Department of Veterans Affairs; the relators in both cases receive part of the sum. In May 2025 the company had refused a ten-year Corporate Integrity Agreement, and the HHS Office of Inspector General lists it in its heightened-scrutiny category. 1 2

qualification
The Justice Department states that the claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only and that there has been no determination of liability.

sources in this section

  1. Press release: Exactech agrees to pay $8 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Alabama (U.S. Department of Justice) · 16 Sep 2025
  2. Corporate Integrity Agreements: Exactech, Inc. (heightened scrutiny) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General · 16 Sep 2025

4Dischargeability

analysisIn February 2025 the Alabama relators and the United States asked the bankruptcy court to rule that Exactech's debt to them could not be discharged because it arose from fraud; the court repeatedly extended the company's time to answer. 1

outcome
The record shows extensions of the answer deadline to October 2025 and the $8 million settlement of the underlying claims; no ruling on dischargeability appears.

sources in this section

  1. Court record source · s-d172 identified by category only · Court record

timeline · 2018–2026

  1. Whistle-blowers file a qui tam suit over Exactech knee implants in Alabama c-quitam-alabama
  2. The Alabama qui tam complaint is unsealed after the United States declines to intervene c-quitam-alabama
  3. Alabama relators and the United States seek a ruling that Exactech's debt is not dischargeable c-dischargeability
  4. Exactech refuses a ten-year Corporate Integrity Agreement c-fca-settlement
  5. Justice Department announces the $8 million False Claims Act settlement c-fca-settlement
  6. Maryland relator dismisses the claims against TPG Capital without prejudice c-quitam-maryland
  7. The Alabama qui tam case is terminated on the docket c-quitam-alabama

cite this dossier

DossierTwist, “Exactech, Inc.: recalls, TPG ownership and bankruptcy”, dt.017, 16 October 2026, https://dossiertwist.com/dossiers/exactech/

Free to read, cite and republish with credit under CC BY 4.0: credit “DossierTwist” and link to the dossier.

Data: JSON, CSV and the network graph.

We listen to all sides: responses are shown next to the claims they answer. To send a correction or a reply, write to dossiertwist@proton.me.